What the FLOCK?

👾

Check out all of the Block Flock GR posts with this link:

The Bigger Picture

A camera on a pole is a camera on a pole. Until it isn't.

Start Here

There's a Flock camera at Burton and Division in Grand Rapids. You probably drive past it on the way to Meijer. It photographs your license plate, logs the time, and uploads that data to a server in the cloud.

That's the local version of this story. A camera, a plate, a timestamp.

Here's what happens next — the part that doesn't fit on a yard sign.

Your Plate Isn't Just a Plate

When that camera on Burton logs your plate, it doesn't just record a number. It records a data point that can be linked to other data points. And there are a lot of other data points.

Your license plate connects to your vehicle registration, which connects to your name and home address through the DMV. Your name connects to your property records, your voter registration, your court records if you have any. Your address connects to your household members, your estimated income bracket, your mortgage status.

None of this requires hacking. All of it is either public record or commercially available for purchase. Data brokers — companies whose entire business model is aggregating and selling personal information — have been doing this for decades. They scrape public records, buy data from apps on your phone, purchase transaction histories, and bundle it all into profiles they sell to anyone willing to pay.

The difference now is that your location history — where your car has been, when, and how often — is being added to that bundle. And unlike your home address, which is relatively static, your movement patterns reveal things about you that are far more intimate than a mailing address ever could.

Where you worship. Where you get medical care. Who you visit at night. How often you cross state lines. Whether you attended a protest.

Source:

Who's Buying?

The U.S. government is buying this data. Not theoretically. Not speculatively. Documented...ly.

The Department of Homeland Security has spent millions of dollars purchasing cell phone location data from data brokers like Venntel and Babel Street — companies that aggregate location pings from mobile advertising networks. Customs and Border Protection contracted with Venntel for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Secret Service entered a multi-year contract with Babel Street worth nearly $2 million. A DHS Inspector General report found that CBP, the Secret Service, and ICE violated federal law through their warrantless purchase and use of this location data.

The FBI does it too. When Senator Ron Wyden asked FBI Director Kash Patel in March 2026 if he would commit to not buying Americans' location data, Patel declined. He said the FBI "uses all tools" and purchases commercially available information consistent with the Constitution.

And it's not just location data from phones. License plate reader data — the exact kind Flock collects — feeds into the same ecosystem. The data that camera on Burton captures about your car doesn't stay in Grand Rapids. It enters a network where it can be queried by thousands of agencies, and it exists in an environment where the federal government has established a practice of buying commercial data to avoid getting warrants.

Sources:

The Machine That Puts It All Together

Buying data is one thing. Making sense of it is another. That's where companies like Palantir come in.

Palantir Technologies is a data analytics company — currently valued at over $200 billion — that builds software platforms for intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and the military. Their core product, Gotham, is designed to ingest data from dozens of different sources and find connections between people, places, vehicles, and events.

This isn't abstract. We know what Palantir does with police data because their own training documents have leaked.

In Los Angeles, Palantir's platform integrated data from at least nineteen separate databases for the LAPD, including incident reports, arrest records, field interviews, gang intelligence files, sex offender registries, foreclosure records, and — yes — license plate reader data. The system contained over one billion license plate photographs from traffic cameras and toll booths across Los Angeles and surrounding areas. Officers could search by name, by plate, by physical description (including scars and tattoos), by address, by associate, or by vehicle. A single query could return a person's home address, mugshot, known associates, family members, vehicles, and a map of every location where their plate had been photographed.

Almost 5,000 LAPD officers — more than half the force — had accounts on the system.

That was one city. Palantir's client list includes police departments across the country, the Department of Defense, the CIA, the NSA, and ICE.

Sources:

Now Add Immigration

In April 2025, ICE awarded Palantir a $30 million contract to build ImmigrationOS — a deportation-focused extension of Palantir's existing case management system. ImmigrationOS is designed to streamline the identification and apprehension of people targeted for removal, track self-deportations in near real-time, and make deportation logistics more efficient.

The underlying system, called ICM (Investigative Case Management), has been running on Palantir's Gotham platform since 2014. It gives every ICE agent access to a network of databases that includes a person's immigration history, employment history, biometric data, family relationships, social media profiles, and — again — license plate reader data.

Now go back to Grand Rapids for a moment.

GRPD's Flock audit logs showed a search on January 5, 2025 with the reason recorded as "deportation warrant." GRPD policy explicitly prohibits using Flock for civil immigration enforcement. The chief publicly denied that the system is used for immigration purposes.

But here's the structural problem: even if Grand Rapids follows its own policy perfectly, the data doesn't stay in Grand Rapids. Flock's national network has been searched by out-of-state and federal agencies over 1.6 million times in seven months in San Francisco alone. The Oxnard Police Department discovered that a "nationwide query" feature had been enabled on their cameras without their knowledge. Flock's standard template agreement grants the company a "worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free" license to aggregated data.

Your plate gets captured in Grand Rapids. The data enters Flock's cloud. A federal agency queries the network. That query result gets ingested into a Palantir-powered system alongside your immigration records, employment history, family connections, and social media.

None of that required a warrant. None of it required your knowledge. None of it required anyone in Grand Rapids to do anything wrong.

Sources:

The Fusion Layer

Between local police departments and federal agencies sits a layer most people have never heard of: fusion centers.

There are 79 DHS-recognized fusion centers across the United States, designed to enable information sharing between federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement. Michigan has its own: the Michigan Intelligence Operations Center (MIOC).

Fusion centers were created after 9/11 to share terrorism-related intelligence. Their mission has since expanded far beyond that original scope to include ordinary criminal activity — and in some documented cases, non-criminal activity like protest monitoring.

The ACLU has raised concerns about fusion centers exploiting differences between federal, state, and local laws to maximize data collection while minimizing oversight. If a data source is restricted at the federal level, it might be accessible through a state or local partner. If a state has privacy protections, the federal system might not. The fusion model allows agencies to route around restrictions through cooperation — what the ACLU calls "policy shopping."

This is the infrastructure that connects a Flock camera in Grand Rapids to a Palantir database at ICE. Not through a single direct pipeline, but through a web of data-sharing agreements, commercial purchases, fusion center partnerships, and platform integrations that collectively make local surveillance data nationally accessible.

Sources:

The Legal Void

Here's where most people assume there must be a law. There isn't.

The Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable government searches. In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Carpenter v. United States that the government needs a warrant to access your historical cell phone location data from a service provider. That was a landmark decision. Privacy advocates celebrated.

But Carpenter left a hole you could drive a surveillance van through.

The ruling specifically addressed cell site location information obtained from phone carriers. It didn't address location data purchased from commercial data brokers. It didn't address license plate reader data. It didn't address data volunteered through apps or collected through advertising networks.

The government noticed.

Rather than get warrants to track people's movements through their phone carriers — which Carpenter now requires — agencies started buying equivalent data from data brokers. Same information. Different source. No warrant needed. The DHS Inspector General found that three agencies violated federal law doing exactly this, but the practice continues.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a framework in May 2024 for how intelligence agencies should handle "commercially available information." The framework establishes guidelines, but it's not a law. It doesn't create enforceable rights for you. It's an internal policy that can be changed, waived, or ignored.

Meanwhile, the ODNI is actively building a centralized "Intelligence Community Data Consortium" — a one-stop shop for spy agencies to purchase commercial data including smartphone location pings, biometric data, real estate records, and social media content. The Intercept reported on the project in May 2025. The system was first conceived under the Biden administration and appears set to go live under the current administration.

There is no federal law regulating the government's purchase of commercially available data. There is no federal law regulating license plate reader data retention. There is no federal law requiring that you be notified when your data is purchased, queried, or incorporated into a government database.

Michigan has no state ALPR law either, though HB 5492 and 5493 are pending.

The legal framework that most people assume exists — the one where the government needs a warrant to track your movements — has a loophole the size of the entire commercial data market. And the government is actively building infrastructure to exploit it at scale.

Sources:

What This Looks Like for You

Let's make this concrete. You — a person living in Grand Rapids, going about your life — generate the following data trail without doing anything unusual:

Your car passes a Flock camera on your commute. That's a location, a timestamp, and a vehicle ID logged in a cloud database searchable by thousands of agencies.

Your phone pings cell towers and advertising networks throughout the day. That location data is collected by apps you've installed, sold to data brokers, and available for purchase by government agencies without a warrant.

Your social media accounts, public records, voter registration, property records, and any court records are aggregated by data brokers into a profile that includes your name, address, household members, estimated income, political affiliations, and interests.

Your financial transactions, loyalty card purchases, and online activity generate behavioral data that further refines your profile.

Now imagine all of that flowing into a single platform — something like Palantir's Gotham — where an analyst can query your name and see your mugshot (if you have one), your home address, your known associates, your family members, your vehicles, every location where your plate has been photographed, your phone's location history, your social media activity, and your immigration status.

That's not a dystopian novel. That's a description of a system that already exists, built from components that are individually legal, commercially available, and operationally deployed.

The only thing separating "fully assembled" from "theoretically possible" for any given individual is whether someone has decided to look.

Why This Matters Even If You Have Nothing to Hide

The "nothing to hide" argument assumes the system works perfectly: that data is accurate, that queries are justified, that algorithms don't produce false positives, and that the people with access never misuse it.

None of those assumptions hold.

License plate readers misread plates. Data brokers sell inaccurate profiles. Algorithms flag innocent behavior as suspicious. Police officers have been caught using law enforcement databases to stalk ex-partners, surveil neighbors, and monitor journalists. Fusion centers have classified peaceful protest groups as potential threats.

And even if the system worked perfectly, the argument misunderstands what privacy is for. Privacy isn't about hiding wrongdoing. It's about maintaining the space between you and power. It's the reason you have curtains on your windows even though you're not doing anything illegal inside your house.

A government that can reconstruct any citizen's movements, relationships, and associations without a warrant — retroactively, at any time, for any reason — has a fundamentally different relationship with its citizens than one that cannot. That's true regardless of who's in office. It's true regardless of whether they exercise that capability today.

The infrastructure is the problem. Once it exists, it's available to whoever holds power next.

So What Now?

This page isn't here to make you paranoid. It's here to make you informed.

The camera on Burton and Division is real. The data network it feeds is real. The companies buying and selling your data are real. The government agencies purchasing that data without warrants are real. The platforms that fuse it all into searchable profiles are real. The legal void that permits all of it is real.

What isn't real — yet — is a legal framework that treats this reality with the seriousness it deserves. No federal privacy law. No ALPR regulation. No data broker accountability. No warrant requirement for commercial data purchases.

That's not an accident. It's a gap that benefits everyone selling the data and everyone buying it. The only people it doesn't benefit are the people generating it.

That's you.

The Flock camera on your commute is a small piece of a much larger system. Understanding the system doesn't require technical expertise. It doesn't require political affiliation. It just requires knowing that it exists.

Now you know.

→ Read the explainer
→ See what's happening in Grand Rapids
→ Get involved

Source Index

Government Data Purchasing:

Palantir & Data Fusion:

Data Brokers:

Legal Framework:

Fusion Centers: